Amazon.com lists over 11,000 items under the search term "fertility"

Sperm donors to veto recipients

Catherine McDiarmid-Watt | Wednesday, December 26, 2007 | 0 comments

REPRODUCTIVE donors will be able to demand their sperm or eggs only go to certain religious, ethnic or cultural groups or be reserved for heterosexual couples under government legislation expected to pass the NSW upper house today.

Women who receive donations now can have a say on the background of the donor but donors will for the first time have the right under law to choose to whom they donate.

The office of the Health Minister, Reba Meagher, said yesterday the law was being changed because it was "in the best interests of the child for the genetic parent to have given consent to the circumstances surrounding the child's birth and upbringing".

Ms Meagher told Parliament: "To put this in another way, it will not be in the child's best interests to discover later in life that their genetic parent has a fundamental objection to their existence or the social and cultural circumstances in which they were raised."

The Greens MP John Kaye was attempting to win Coalition support to change the bill last night. He said the Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill gave "sperm and egg donors the ability to specifically discriminate against single mothers, lesbian and ethnic and religious groups".

Mr Kaye said the bill would grant "legal sanction to bigotry and prejudice".

"[It] sends an appalling message that it is acceptable to discriminate on grounds that are irrelevant. It will also reduce the availability of donor sperm to single mothers, thus increasing the amount of self-insemination. This can have negative health consequences in some cases."

The medical ethicist Leslie Cannold, from Melbourne University, said she found the NSW proposal "offensive".

Dr Cannold, who is on the infertility authority board in Victoria, said arguments for such provisions were that they encouraged more sperm and egg donors but she said it was discriminatory.

"The whole idea of donating is giving and I don't think you give gifts with those sort of conditions attached," she said.

The bill also contains provisions requiring sperm donors to register their names, enabling children to make contact with the donors once they turn 18.

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/sperm-donors-to-veto-recipients/2007/11/27/1196036893154.html

Stories of Pregnancy & Birth over 44y
- Daily blog of hope & inspiration!

4,200 Stories of Pregnancy & Birth over 44y
All the stories, divided by age, 1st pregnancy & high FSH!

"In 2005, there were more than 104,000 births in the United States to women ages 40 through 44, and over 6,500 to women 45 and older. In 2004, there were 1,786 live births to women over 42, using donor eggs."





Category: ,

Catherine

About Catherine: I am mom to three grown sons, two grandchildren and two rescue dogs. After years of raising my boys as a single mom, I remarried a wonderful man who had never had a child of his own. Unexpectedly, I found myself pregnant at 49!
Sadly we lost that precious baby at 8 weeks, and decided to try again. Five more losses, turned down for donor egg, foster care and adoption due to my age and losses - we have accepted that there will be no more babies in our house.

Find Catherine on Google+ - Circle us on Google+ - Join us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter

0 comments

WE LOVE COMMENTS!
Don't just sit there, reading this story or article - say something! Do you believe it? Do you think it is impossible? Do you wish it was you? Do you have a story to share (it might get published!)

NOTE: Comments are moderated - just to stop the spambots - and so may take up to a few hours to be approved.

Catherine reserves the right to review, edit, refuse or delete any comment.

Popular Posts