Home
Fertility
,
pregnancy
Why the baby-making process needs a few months more
Catherine McDiarmid-Watt |
Thursday, May 21, 2009 |
0
comments
Picture by ddrlfoto
More and more experts, from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the American Academy of Pediatrics, are challenging the traditional nine-month timeline for having a baby by suggesting that it's time to add a few months to the whole baby-making process.
"These extra months aren't meant to be spent being pregnant, they're meant to be spent getting ready to be pregnant," writes Heidi Murkoff in "What to Expect Before You're Expecting." Murkoff and Sharon Mazel, authors of arguably the most popular book on pregnancy in America, "What to Expect When You're Expecting," have teamed again to bring couples a comprehensive guide to preparing and planning for a pregnancy.
Read more: http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=294212&src=120
Category:
Fertility,
pregnancy
About Catherine: I am mom to three grown sons, two grandchildren and two rescue dogs. After years of raising my boys as a single mom, I remarried a wonderful man who had never had a child of his own. Unexpectedly, I found myself pregnant at 49!
Sadly we lost that precious baby at 8 weeks, and decided to try again. Five more losses, turned down for donor egg, foster care and adoption due to my age and losses - we have accepted that there will be no more babies in our house.
Find Catherine on Google+ - Circle us on Google+ - Join us on Facebook - Follow us on Twitter
WE LOVE COMMENTS!
Don't just sit there, reading this story or article - say something! Do you believe it? Do you think it is impossible? Do you wish it was you? Do you have a story to share (it might get published!)
NOTE: Comments are moderated - just to stop the spambots - and so may take up to a few hours to be approved.
Catherine reserves the right to review, edit, refuse or delete any comment.
Popular Posts
-
More and more people are delaying parenthood until they are in their forties or even older. Women over 35 getting pregnant, are the faste...
-
Photo Credit: Kenyan Kiss , by Amanda Kline Found this post by Ally (Ocelot Cub) on FertilityFriends.co.uk : Ally wrote: I have colle...
-
David in his hospital bassinet, by Jessica Merz on Flickr It's time to update this quote: "In 2009, there were 105,827 live ...
-
Photo credit: Belly , by Alena Getman Vitex/Chasteberry has been billed as the natural Clomid for quite a few years. It can be found...
-
Photo Credit: Freep.com - All rights reserved In her early 40s, Deborah Walker still had hopes of becoming a mom. Like many of her pee...
-
Lunar Astrology Wall Calendar Dr. Eugen Jonas, medical doctor, made in 1950's the following discoveries: The Lunar Conception : Wo...
More and more experts, from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the American Academy of Pediatrics, are challenging the traditional nine-month timeline for having a baby by suggesting that it's time to add a few months to the whole baby-making process.
0 comments