Racing to Beat the Maternal Clock
A doctor is silhouetted as he walks past a poster showing images of the development of a human fetus at a fertility clinic.
In Brief:
5 Despite continuing refinements in fertility treatments, researchers have not been able to provide what career-minded adults seek: an extension of the years in which a woman is fertile.
5 The viability of conventionally frozen eggs is still inferior to that of frozen sperm and embryos.
5 The freezing of ovarian tissue, still highly experimental, may offer new options to cancer patients facing sterilizing treatments.
With genetic abnormalities in many embryos correcting themselves by day five, clinics are waiting longer to transfer embryos into patients.
In the nearly 30 years since Louise Brown made history as the first test-tube baby, more than one million infants have been conceived by means of in vitro fertilization. Assisted reproductive technologies continue to advance, but increasingly they are pushing against one of nature’s great barriers to fertility: maternal age.
“Many infertility specialists are surprised by the number of otherwise highly educated older couples with unrealistic expectations of fertility,” Dr. Bradley J. Van Voorhis, a fertility expert at the University of Iowa School of Medicine, wrote recently in The New England Journal of Medicine. “The negative effect of a woman’s age on fertility cannot be overemphasized.”
Certainly, new options to extend fertility are testing the limits of who can get pregnant, and when. They are also raising fresh medical, economic and ethical concerns.
Whereas scientists for decades have been freezing human embryos for later implantation into the womb, now a process called vitrification enables technicians to flash-freeze unfertilized human eggs in a matter of seconds, greatly improving their survival rates.
The process is considered superior to conventional slow-freezing methods because it prevents the formation of ice crystals in the egg that could damage DNA. Sperm later meets thawed egg through in vitro fertilization, and the resulting embryo is implanted in the womb. The technique increases the chances of successful pregnancy later in life for a young woman without a partner who must, or wants to, defer starting a family.
“I think this will emancipate women as much as the birth control pill did in 1960,” said Dr. Sherman Silber, a fertility specialist in St. Louis, Mo., one of a limited number of doctors in the country to offer the novel procedure. In a recent study in Spain, there were no differences in pregnancy rates in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with embryos from either fresh or flash-frozen eggs. About 45 percent in each group conceived.
The experimental procedure, however, is not without its sacrifices — and skeptics. Potent drugs must be used to stimulate a patient’s ovaries, and then the eggs must be aspirated while she is sedated. Vitrification is also expensive, often more than $5,000 just for freezing the eggs, in addition to the cost of fertilization.
Vitrification may improve the odds that older women will be able to conceive from eggs that they donated when they were younger, but it doesn’t offer much help to middle-aged women whose eggs were never frozen. There’s little point in a woman preserving her eggs if she’s over 35 years old, when fertility starts to diminish. The younger the eggs, the better their quality.
Still, many fertility centers limit egg-freezing services only to younger cancer patients facing treatments that will leave them sterile. Patients usually are warned that frozen eggs are not as reliable as frozen embryos and sperm because of the egg’s extreme sensitivity to temperature.
“I’ve had to tell young women facing cancer treatment and the loss of ovarian function that it’s not really reliable,” said Dr. Richard Marrs, managing partner of California Fertility Partners in Los Angeles. “The odds are better for them if they freeze embryos.”
Trying to improve the odds, some researchers, including Dr. Silber, have begun freezing not only eggs but ovarian tissue as well. Thin slices from the ovary are removed through a small incision below the navel, preserved with slow freezing, then transplanted back into the woman’s body when she’s ready to try to get pregnant, in some cases years later. The aim is to have the tissue grow and start functioning again, triggering normal ovulation cycles and eventually leading to conception.
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine has acknowledged the potential of frozen eggs and ovarian tissues, but for now recommends these experimental techniques only for younger women undergoing cancer treatments, not for those postponing pregnancy for lifestyle reasons like pursuing a career. “The biological clock is real for most women, and that has to be recognized,” said Sean Tipton, a spokesman for the society.
More widely used fertility techniques that were developed to improve the odds of a successful pregnancy in older women, like pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or P.G.D., are not without their controversies, too. Developed about a decade ago to weed out embryos with genetic abnormalities prior to implantation, P.G.D. might one day help parents select not just a child’s gender, but perhaps his eye color or other characteristics.
Many reputable clinics find it a slippery ethical slope and employ the procedure only on a limited basis. “We use P.G.D., but we’re very selective when we use it,” Dr. Marrs said. “The prime reason to do it is if you have a family history of single gene disorders like Tay-Sachs, Huntington’s chorea, cystic fibrosis.”
Furthermore, critics claim, P.G.D. may have resulted in clinics discarding healthy embryos. Several studies have shown that many genetic abnormalities appearing in a three-day-old embryo correct themselves by the fifth day. As a result of this finding, a number of clinics now wait until the fifth day to test and transfer embryos into the woman’s uterus. Doctors also tend to transfer fewer of them, thereby reducing the incidence of multiple births and its attendant complications, including premature labor and low birth weight.
Despite these refinements in assisted reproductive technologies, fertility scientists have not been able to change the basic fact that a woman’s fertility diminishes with age.
“The younger the woman, the better her chances of fertility,” said Dr. Zev Rosenwaks, director of The Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility at New York-Presbyterian Hospital. “If there are any signs of infertility — absence of periods, irregular periods — couples should pay attention. Seek help earlier rather than later.”
TODAY'S BOOK SUGGESTION:
It Starts with the Egg:How the Science of Egg Quality Can Help You Get Pregnant Naturally, Prevent Miscarriage, and Improve Your Odds in IVF
by Rebecca Fett
-- Whether you are trying to conceive naturally or through IVF, the quality of your eggs will have a powerful impact on how long it takes you to get pregnant and whether you face an increased risk of miscarriage.
Poor egg quality is emerging as the single most important cause of age-related infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and failed IVF cycles. It is also a major contributor to infertility in PCOS.
Based on a comprehensive investigation of a vast array of scientific research, It Starts with the Egg reveals a groundbreaking new approach for improving egg quality and fertility.
With a concrete strategy including minimizing exposure to toxins such as BPA and phthalates, choosing the right vitamins and supplements to safeguard developing eggs, and harnessing nutritional advice shown to boost IVF success rates, this book offers practical solutions to will help you get pregnant faster and deliver a healthy baby.
Paperback: 304 pagesClick to order/for more info: It Starts with the Egg
Start reading It Starts with the Egg on your Kindle in under a minute!Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Category: biological clock, chromosomal disorder, Egg Freezing, embryo transfer, Fertility, genomic imprinting abnormalities, infertility, IVF, multiple birth
0 comments